The Containing Creative Space

Let’s start by amplifying “the transitional containing space” as a symbol.

Containment, the foundation of this creative approach, is like a vessel. According to Erich Neumann, the symbol of the vessel developed from the mother with her baby, and represents the positive all-giving mother, boundless love.

In ancient times, the making of a clay pot was associated with the making of a child, the shaping of life. The all-good mother contains, protects and gives birth to the new. This mystery of creation, the coniunctio, is a numinous experience.

As giving birth, the vessel is a creative symbol of life. As potbellied, she bears and incubates all things. But if the vessel is the womb, it is also the tomb and as such also represents the possibility of death to the old thing, transformation, renewal.

The key aspects of the alchemical process seem to be a containing space, an ethical, meditative attitude, projection, reflection. We find this same process expressed in the creative process.

In Alchemy, Mercurius as the vas is the womb and the fetus. (Jung, CW16:454) That is, he is the container and the stone, the divine child, the symbol-to-be, as well as its developing, unfolding process. He is the fire, and he is the water, (Jung, CW12:338) the eternal opposites forever in conflict. Without the containing vas, the unfolding volatile process will dissolve. As “the world creating spirit imprisoned in matter,” Mercurius stands at the beginning and the end of the work like the tail-biting serpent, constantly destroying and renewing himself. (Jung, CW12:404) As such, he is the Self.

The old alchemists, engaging with their material in their laboratories, strongly emphasized an ethical psychic approach, a meditative and imaginative attitude to the work. In this frame of mind, they unconsciously projected their own psychological processes onto their work, filling everything unknown and empty with psychological projections. (Jung, CW12:332) The unfolding of this process was objectively noted and reflected upon. (Jung, CW12:366)

References

Chodorow, Joan. (1997) Encountering Jung: Jung on Active Imagination. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press. P. 5 – 17; 43 – 60; 73 – 76; 91 – 96; 146 – 153

Hannah, Barbarah. (2000) The Inner Journey. Toronto, Canada: Inner City Books. P. 34 – 45

Kalsched, Donald. (1996) The Inner World of Trauma. London, UK: Routledge. P. 197 – 200

Jacobi, J. (1959) Complex, Archetype, Symbol. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press. P. 74 – 88; 94 – 103

Jung, CG. (1969) Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York, USA. Random House Inc. P. 340

Jung, CG. (1968) Collective Works 12. 41 Princeton, NJ, US: Princeton University Press. Par. 322, 366.

Neumann, E. (1955). The Great Mother. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press. P. 120, 125, 128, 132, 136, 158.